Rethinking Africa is a forward looking blog dedicated to the exchange of innovative thinking on issues affecting the advancement of African peoples wherever they are. We provide rigorous and insightful analyses on the issues affecting Africans and their vision of the world.
(Born c1745, Essaka, Biafra; dies 31 March 1797, London, England) One of the African World’s most celebrated intellectuals – sailor, explorer, expeditionist, entrepreneur, orator, versatile campaigner and active exponent of African freedom (during the 1780s in Britain) from enslavement and other spheres of subjugation by an assemblage of European states and interests and their “successor states” in the Americas/Caribbean, begun in the 15th century, visionary of eventual African liberation, author of the classic, The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavus Vassa, the African (1789)
(Ornette Coleman Quartet, “Ecars” [personnel: Coleman, tenor saxophone; Don Cherry, pocket trumpet; Jimmy Garrison, bass; Ed Blackwell, drums; recorded: Atlantic Studios, New York, US, 27 March 1961])
This piece is indeed
part of work in progress and is only presented here because of the recent
interview of USPresident Barack Obama in The
Atlantic magazine (Jeffery Goldberg, “The Obama Doctrine”, The Atlantic, April 2016 Issue, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/04/the-obama-doctrine/471525/, accessed 11 March 2016). It
is therefore going to be skeletal but its essence is not provisional as the final outcome of the study next year will demonstrate.
In 2001, I called on
the leaders of the world’s principal arms-manufacturing states to ban all arms sales/transfers to Africa
(Herbert Ekwe-Ekwe, African Literature in Defence of History: An Essay on
Chinua Achebe, 2001: 134-138). This was in response to the rampaging
post-(European)conquest genocide and other wars in Africa, begun
catastrophically by Nigeria and its British ally when they both perpetrated the
Igbo genocide in May 1966-Janaury 1970 with the murder of 3.1 million Igbo people or
one-quarter of this nation’s population. Since the Igbo genocide, 12 million
additional Africans have been murdered in follow-up genocides in Rwanda, Darfur
and in other regions in the Sudan, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo,
and in multiple wars across virtually all regions of the continent. Besides being
co-perpetrator of the Igbo genocide, Britain has also emerged as the lead arms
supplier to Africa including its genocide-states, especially Nigeria.
In June 2009, six
months after the inauguration of Barack Obama as the 44th president of the US,
I updated the appeal to the globe’s lead arms-manufacturing countries and noted,
as follows:
US President Obama, his country’s first African-descent head of
state, can be assured of a lasting legacy of his presidency by imposing a
comprehensive US arms embargo on this continent of his fathers at the cusp of
constructing new states of organic sensibilities – away from the terror of the
genocide state. Obama should expand this initiative to involve other
arms-exporters-to-Africa especially on such forums as the UN security council
and the G-8. Arms ban to Africa should be internationally mandatory and
enforceable (Herbert Ekwe-Ekwe, Readings from Reading: Essays on African
Politics, Genocide, Literature, 2011: 193).
Seven years and
three months into his 2-term presidency which ends nine months away in January
2017, Obama gives the interview to The
Atlantic. It is on his foreign policy during the period. This is a
wide-ranging survey but one that hardly focuses on any subject on Africa except
the 2011 US-British-French invasion of Libya, itself discussed, instead, within
the overarching parameters of Middle East/Arab/islamic affairs. Muammar
Gaddafi’s regime is overthrown during the course of the invasion, Gaddafi is
murdered as well as some members of his family in addition to some influential
officials of his regime, most Libyan cities and infrastructure (irrefutable
landmark achievements of the Gaddafi years in office) are spectacularly smashed
up, and Libya is subsequently, today, an “ISIS haven” (as The Atlantic interviewer Jeffery Goldberg terms it), largely controlled
by groupings within the islamist jihadist international conglomeration – part
of who Gaddafi was at war with prior to the West Trio invasion and murder.
In the interview, Obama
describes the aftermath of the Libya invasion as a “mess”, a “s*** show”,
blames the British and French leaders (David Cameron and Nicolas Sarkozy
respectively) who he co-led the invasion for this resultant “ISIS haven – that he
[Obama] has [latterly] targeted with air strikes” but, curiously, absolves
himself from the débâcle. For Obama, Cameron’s and Sarkozy’s roles in the
campaign are those of “free riders” who obviously cherish the perceived political
capital that such invasions bring from enthusiastic sectors of domestic
political opinion but are often less thoughtful of the consequences that such
devastating acts of violence have on the ground or region of the world of perpetration,
as they await eagerly for the invasion next time!
So, on Libya, after
the troika-invasion, Obama recalls with barely disguised criticism, Cameron and
Sarkozy just moved on… Cameron loses interest on this phase of the
crisis/emergency, the “follow-up”, as he is “distracted by other things” whilst
Sarkozy appears more interested to “trumpet the flights he [is] taking in the
[invasion’s] air campaign” even though, Obama is keen to emphasise, “we [the
US] had wiped out all [Libyan] air defenses and essentially set up the entire
infrastructure [for the invasion]”.
Raft of ironies
What is at the crux
of the politics of this post-Libya invasion apparent dilemma is the
operationalisation of Obama’s so-called leading-from-behind strategy in the
pursuit and promulgation of foreign policy projects with his allies, especially
those in Europe, on the crucial task of role assignment/rationalisation. On
this accord, ironically, Sarkozy’s exaggerated claims of France’s role in the
invasion is a boon to Obama’s “leading-from-behind” positioning as it enabled
the US to “purchase France’s involvement in a way that made it less expensive
for us and less risky for us”. The key phrase is of course “less risky”
and the Africa continent, in focus, where the French already had the notorious
record of having carried out forty-nine (49)
invasions of most of the 22 “francophonie” countries here in the previous 51
years with hardly any international repercussions, couldn’t be better placed than
anywhere else in the world, particularly the South World, as the geographical
site to mount such an aggression involving the US with minimal risks. It should
also be noted that “leading-from-behind” is a cardinal feature of the overall presumed “retrenchment” thrust or
dynamics of Obama’s foreign policy based on his readings of US’s international
relations in the past: “We have history … We have history with Iran, we have
history with Indonesia and Central America. So we have to understand our history
when we start talking about intervening, and understand the source of other
people’s suspicions”. Yet the 2011 US co-led invasion of Libya fits in more
appropriately with this “we have history”-heritage than a candidacy for some
envisaged “retrenchment” of interventionist/expansionist programmes overseas.
In yet another
startling irony, not covered in The
Atlantic interview, Obama had, in 2010, one year in office, reinstated the trail of France’s invasion history in Africa (mentioned above) which
President Bush, his predecessor, had frozen for seven years as “punishment” for
the French 2003 refusal to join the US-led coalition invasion of Iraq. Soon
after the embargo was lifted, Sarkozy ordered the French military, true to
type, to attack Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire (French invasion no. 49 of an African
state since 1960), a presage to the
following year’s Sarkozy-Cameron-Obama Libya invasion (again for the French,
Africa invasion no. 50 since 1960), overthrew state president Laurent Gbagbo,
arrested him and his wife and dragged them to an international court in The
Hague for “trial” on trumped-up charges, installed a local puppet as a Gbagbo
replacement, murdered 2300 Africans during the course of the assault, and significantly
destroyed several business and residential districts of Abidjan. In 2012,
following his loss in the French presidential elections, Sarkozy passes his
country’s invasion-baton-for-Africa to successor François Hollande, who, in
turn, has since dispatched the French military to invade Mali (2013) and
Central African Republic (2013).
Not-“retrenchment”
and ongoing Igbo genocide in Biafra
It should now be
evident that Africa does not figure distinctly in the frame of Obama’s assumed
policy of “retrenchment” of spheres of US interventionism abroad. On the
contrary, Africa very much represents the territorial zone of US’s
not-“retrenchment”. Despite Obama’s criticism of the British and French
leaderships on post-Libya invasion intra-coalition relations, he has in fact
privileged the role of these dual lead-conqueror states of Africa in the
pursuit of other goals of US interventionism on the continent more under the contemptuous
tactical rubric of “Africa is direct responsibility of London and Paris”, a
throwback particularly to the 1950s-1970 era of the Dwight Eisenhower-Lynden
Johnson presidencies, which also manifests itself in that working slogan
already cited, “leading-from-behind”. We will refer to one other goal as an
example and this has profound consequences across the African World and history.
Considering this importance, it requires a bit of background for elucidation.
In March 2015, the
US, in close collaboration with Britain, imposed Muhammadu Buhari as head of
Nigeria regime (echoes of “we have a history with Iran”?/“we have a history
with Indonesia”?). Buhari has been known to the British for 50 years – since the
outbreak of the May 1966 Igbo genocide, the foundational genocide of
post-(European)conquest Africa, launched by its client state Nigeria. As
already noted, 3.1 million Igbo or 25 per cent of the Igbo population were
murdered during the genocide. Britain, which until six years earlier was the
conqueror-occupying power in Nigeria for sixty-years, supported the genocide politically,
diplomatically and militarily – right from its launch date, Sunday 29 May 1966,
and throughout its gruesome and devastating three phases during the course of
44 months ending 12 January 1970 ( http://re-thinkingafrica.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/herbert-ekwe-ekwe-conquerors-concord-in.html). Nigeria launched phase-IV of the genocide
on 13 January 1970. This has continued unabated with tens of thousands of
Igbo murdered and their Biafra homeland effectively occupied by Nigeria.
Britain has maintained support for the genocide wholeheartedly and steadfastly during
this latter phase (http://re-thinkingafrica.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/herbert-ekwe-ekwe-conquerors-concord-in.html).
Muhammadu Buhari himself has been a
genocidist operative in the Nigeria military – straight ahead from the launch date
of the Igbo genocide and during the Nigerian expansive trail of the mass
slaughter of Igbo military and civilians alike in north and west Nigeria
regions from 29 July 1966-July 1967 to encapsulate phases I-II of the genocide
timeframe. During phase-III of the genocide, the invasion of Biafra, July
1967-January 1970, Buhari was commander of a genocidist corps in north and
northcentral Biafra, slaughtering to the hilt. As from 13 January 1970,
beginning of phase-IV of the genocide, Buhari has adhered rigidly to or
overseen the Nigeria regime’s blanket policy of non-development of occupied
Biafra, the regime’s aggressive degradation of socioeconomic life in Biafra,
and the regime’s exponential expropriation of the rich oil reserves of Biafra.
Biafran assets looted by the occupation stand at US$1000 billion. Over time,
since 13 January 1970, Buhari has exhibited a calculated, deafening silence
over the course of the murder of those tens of thousands of Igbo people across
Nigeria but especially in his north Nigeria homeland by regime forces/allied
forces including those massacred by the Boko Haram terrorist organisation in
the past six years.
So sinceBuhari came to power in May 2015 as a
result of that US-British intervention and imposition, hundreds of Igbo people
demanding the restoration of their independence and the release of several
members of the freedom leadership including Nnamdi Kanu, head of the Indigenous
People of Biafra and broadcaster at Biafra freedom radio, have been murdered –
usually shot at sight during peaceful freedom marches by the Nigerian genocidist
military and police equipped mostly with British weapons. Beginning at the
Oshimili River twin city of Onicha on 2 December 2015, this orgy of massacres by
the Nigerian military has spread to other Biafran cities including Asaba,
Enuugwu, Igwe Ocha, Umuahia and Aba through the remaining of December and into
January-March 2016. The massacres have been meticulously documented by several
news organisations and individuals and human rights groups (http://re-thinkingafrica.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/onitsha-nigeria-4-th-march2016.html). The 9 February
2016 Aba massacre of 22 Biafrans attending a morning prayer session in a local
high school by the genocidists (International Society for Civil Liberties &
the Rule of Law, Onicha, 21 February 2016) was particularly
gruesome and shocking and very disturbing images from the scene have since gone
viral on the internet. In a sentence, genocidist Nigeria military contingents
are literally at loose in Biafra massacring and maiming defenceless people who
express their inalienable right to freedom and beginning in early February
(2016), they have been joined by Fulani
militia terrorists rampaging swathes of villages in north, northcentral and
southwest of Biafra. On a comparative
note, the Nigerian genocidist troopers have attacked chosen or pre-targeted
Biafran population centres with the same spontaneity, precision and virulence
that a Boko Haram terrorist cell would employ in attacking fishing communities
in Baga, north Nigeria, or a church in Yola (north Nigeria) or an ISIS
terrorist unit would effect whilst attacking the Charlie Hebdo editorial board
meeting in Paris, France, or attacking a Jewish supermarket in Paris or a rock
concert in Paris or attacking an airport terminal in Brussels, Belgium, or
attacking a metro train in Brussels…
Noticeably, there has been no condemnation of
any of the stretch of Nigerian genocidist military attacks on the Biafran
public during these past three months (launched 2 December 2015) from David
Cameron’s British government. The same haunting silence pervades from the Obama
administration. Not a word. In sharp contrast, when on 12 December (2015) a
Nigeria military brigade operating in Zaria, northcentral Nigeria, attacked and
murdered several shiite muslim protesters in a procession, there was a robust response
from the US government: “The United States calls on the government of Nigeria to
quickly, credibly, and transparently investigate these events in Zaria and hold
to account any individuals found to have committed crimes”. This same US government wouldn’t,
didn’t follow up with similar or any other statements of concern in the
following acts of Nigerian genocidist attacks on Igbo population in Biafra:
Onicha (17 December), where eight Biafrans were murdered and scores wounded;
Aba (19 January 2016), where 10 Biafrans were murdered and scores wounded; Aba (9
February), where 22 were murdered and scores wounded.
(Aba massacre:…
genocidist Nigeria military guns down 22 peaceful Biafrans involved in an early morning open air prayer session for freedom, National High
School Aba, Biafra, Thursday 9 February 2016)
“African American
son”
In introducing the
section of The Atlantic interview
with Obama that focuses on Israel, Jeffery Goldberg recalls a conversation
between Obama and Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu which perhaps
captures the “frosty” characterisation that many an observer has used in describing
the latter’s relationship in the past seven years. “Obama felt that Netanyahu
was behaving in a condescending fashion,” Goldberg writes, as the Israeli
leader had “launched into something of a lecture about the brutal region in
which he lives…” Obama retorts: “Bibi, you
have to understand something … I’m the African American son of a single mother,
and I live here, in this house. I live in the White House. I managed to get
elected president of the United States. You think I don’t understand what
you’re talking about, but I do.”
As I indicated at
the beginning of these reflections, Africa, the African World, hardly features anywhere
as a subject of focus or discussion in
this interview covering Obama’s foreign policy during seven years in office as
US president. The reader may therefore wonder what relevance Obama’s reference
to “African American son” or indeed his “White House” home address during the exchange
with Netanyahu has to the entire thrust of the interview beyond the record
reminder, an important one that must be stressed, given the pivotal role played
by the African humanity in this history, of the first person of African descent
to occupy the position of president of the United States 233 years after the
founding of the republic. But the focus, surely, cannot begin and just end with
an African “entry” in the “White House”! What does the occupier do whilst there
in residence? How do they embody and respond to the weight of the African
history antecedent? What is this African history? What has the occupier done
whilst there in residence?
African Atlantic
discourses
Soon after Obama’s
inauguration as president in January 2009, quite a few African World scholars
envisaged the reactivation, in some formats, of those democratic forums and
spaces where African Atlantic discourses involving a range of outstanding
intellectuals were so instrumental in launching and implementing transformative
initiatives that have been of profound benefits across the African World
especially in the past 300 years. Unfortunately, this reactivation hasn’t
occurred and, interestingly ironical, that Netanyahu’s “lecture”-designation
Goldberg referred to in the interview hasn’t been totally dissimilar to what
some African continental heads of regime feel has been Obama’s own approach to
them in their relations.
Still on the African
Atlantic discourses, it is extraordinary to wish to contemplate how the
intellectuals engaged in this circle would deliberate over the historic tragedy
of an African-descent occupier in the “White House” residence who has watched in
deafening silence since 2 December 2015 as the head of the ruthless genocidist
regime in Nigeria, whom he had earlier on installed in office in collaboration with
the British prime minister, murders peaceful and defenceless Africans in Biafra
so ghastly for a reason not any more complicated than that 7-letter word that
has come to define the strategic quest of the African World for 400 years: freedom. So, what would the following from
some of the brightest minds of this assemblage think of the tragedy – Olaudah
Equiano, Sojourner Truth, Harriet Tubman, Edward Wilmot Blyden, Frederick
Douglass, WEB Du Bois, James Baldwin, Léopold Sédar Senghor, CLR James, Eric Williams, Martin Luther King,
Malcolm X, Chinua Achebe, Cheikh Anta Diop, John Henrik Clarke, Fela
Anikulapo-Kuti, George Lamming, John Coltrane, Julius Nyerere, Alain Locke, Nelson
Mandela, Steve Biko, Ivan Van Sertima, Aimé Césaire, Nicolás Guillén, Chukwuemeka
Odumegwu-Ojukwu, Mariam Makeba, Ossie Davis, Marcus Garvey, Ruby Dee, Louis Armstrong, George
James, Walter Rodney, Jacob Carruthers, Toni Morrison, Théophile
Obenga, King
Jaja of Opobo, Duke Ellington, Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, Christopher Okigbo, Kwame Nkrumah,
Martin Delaney, Adu Boahen, Nwafor Orizu, Mbonu Ojike, Bethuel Ogot, Amilcar Cabral, Max Roach, Bob
Marley, Robert Sobukwe, George Russell, Okot p’Bitek, W Arthur Lewis, Chancellor Williams, Patrice
Lumumba, Kenneth Onwuka Dike, David Diop, Adiele Afigbo, Peter Tosh, Kofi
Awoonor, Molefi Kete Asante, Charles Mingus, Uche Okeke, Wangari
Maathai, Ifeanyi Menkiti, Esiaba Irobi, Maurice Bishop, Dedan Kimathi, Michael Echeruo, Maulana Karenga,
Alioune Diop, Eni Njoku, Ama Ata Aidoo, Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o, Eric Dolphy, Ousmane Sembéne, Mariama Bâ, Léon-Gontram
Damas, Agwuncha Arthur Nwankwo, Sydney Poitier, Abbey Lincoln, Uzo Egonu, Langston Hughes, Emmanuel Obiechina, Mariamba Ani,
Thomas Sankara, Hilary Beckles.
(George Russell Sextet here plays
“Nardis”, a composition by Miles Davis[personnel: Russell, piano;Don
Ellis, trumpet;Dave Baker,
trombone;Eric Dolphy,
bass clarinet;Steve Swallow,
bass;Joe Hunt, drums;
recorded: Riverside Records, New York, 8 May 1961])
(Born 28 March 1912, Cayenne, French-occupied Guiana)
Poet, editor, philosopher, academic, co-founder, with Léopold Sédar Senghor and Aimé Césaire, of the 1930s-1940s “negritude” intellectual movement of African affirmation in Paris, France, and whose demonstrable volume of poetry, Pigments (1937), gives notice of the engaging trajectory of the movement:
One of Africa’s preeminent historians whose A History of the Upper Guinea Coast, 1545-1800 (1970) and How Europe Underdeveloped Africa (1972) are compulsory references in the study of Africa and African peoples worldwide of the past 500 years
Eloquent and iconic news presenteron Biafran resistance radio broadcasting corporation during the Igbo genocide, 29 May 1966-12 January 1970, and versatile actor whose play of the Okonkwo character in a 1987 television adaptation of the classicThings Fall Apart(Chinua Achebe) remains critically acclaimed Twitter @HerbertEkweEkwe
One of the most prolific and distinguished film directors of his generation (releasing over 30 movies in a career begun 1983, including the classic Malcolm X [1992]), actor, producer, writer, academic
(Biafrans marching in the Waterford parade, Thursday 17 March 2016 [24:01 mins]... the Biafrans join the parade at 7.23 mins into the video clip: … hearty, resolute, focussed)
(Yvonne Chioma Mbanefo, Okowaokwu Igbo Umuaka: Igbo Dictionary for Children [L0ndon: Learn Igbo Now, 2016], 308pp, £10.00pb, £6.99 kindle/Euro 13.72pb, Euro 7.73 kindle/US$14.00pb, US$8.62 kindle)
(Yvonne Chioma Mbanefo: Okowaokwu Igbo Umuaka: Igbo Dictionary for Children)
Yvonne Chioma Mbanefo has won numerous
awards for her contributions to Igbo language learning. She is one of the
organisers of the Annual International Igbo conference at the School of Oriental
and African Studies, University of London. Mbanefo is a Fellow of the Higher
Education Academy, United Kingdom. She is a digital strategist and director at
a London based IT firm. She is trained in digital media, information design,
and elearning. She has done extensive research in the use of both digital and
traditional media in modern language learning. In her spare time she uses her
digital and information design skills to create Igbo language learning
materials at www.LearnIgboNow.com.
Herbert Ekwe-Ekwe The “Igbo Question” is intrinsically linked to the Igbo strategic goal,
presently, which is to end the occupation of their Biafran homeland by
genocidist Nigeria– imposed
since 13 January 1970. This is a structural facet of phase-IV of the genocide,
launched byNigeriaon 29 May 1966. 3.1 million Igbo
people or one-quarter of this nation were murdered byNigeriaand
Britain. Britain supported the genocide right from conceptualisation to
execution – politically, diplomatically, militarily. These were 44 months of
uninterrupted, unimaginable carnage and barbarity perpetrated on a people. Pointedly,
no single nation or people inAfricahas suffered this extent of gruesome
and devastating state(s)-premeditated and organised genocide in history.
(George Russell Sextet, “Thoughts” [personnel: Russell, piano; Don Ellis, trumpet; Dave Baker, trombone; Eric Dolphy, bass clarinet; Steve Swallow, bass; Joe Hunt, drums; recorded Riverside Record, New York, US, 28 May 1961])
The genocide continues unabated (as several essays and other recent entries
in re-thinking.blogspot.co.uk demonstrate) and Britain’s support continues
unflinchingly crucial. For Britain, contrary to the often clanking histrionics
of prevailing international politics rhetoric, its strategic alliance here, in
this African region, has always been with the islamist north region
Hausa-Fulani leadership which vociferously opposed the restoration of African
independence from the British occupation. It is Britain’s alliance with this leadership
situated atop the Nigeria constellation-equation that makes up the
Anglo-Nigerian amalgam that executed the Igbo genocide. It is also from groupings
with this same leadership that both Boko Haram (currently the world’s most
ruthless terrorist organisation, according to the Institute for Economics &
Peace, http://re-thinkingafrica.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/institute-for-economics-peace-global.html) and the Fulani militia (see also the IE&P’s study on this militia) were
created and unleashed to murder tens of thousands of Africans and others in
these times.
So, given the critical links between the salient features of the
politics of the Nigerian occupation of Biafra and the overarching architecture
of the genocidal campaign, it is the case that the Igbo termination of the
occupation is at once the beginning of their freedom march from Nigeriaand the
implementation of an unprecedentedly expansive socioeconomic programme of
reconstruction. The route remains Igbo freedom from Nigeria, an inalienable Igbo
right with or without the genocide as I have argued severally. If the Scots,
for instance, one-tenth of the Igbo population and without a genocide
antecedent would wish to leave a union they have largely been
exponential beneficiaries for 300 years (“Rights for Scots, Rights for the
Igbo”, http://re-thinkingafrica.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/rights-for-scots-rights-for-igbo.html), the
Igbo, surely, don’t require any agonisingly turgid historical and sociological
treatise to wish to leave Nigeria.
Rarefication Contrary to the amazingly ahistorical
discourses on the nature of the state and its survivability in some circles,
particularly in Africa where the prevailing eurocentric conquest social sciences
curriculum essentially rarefies the “state”, the state is very much a transient
relationship in human history: Kemet, Roman “empire”, Ghana “empire”,
Mali “empire”, Czarist “empire”, Austro-Hungarian “empire”, Ottoman
“empire”, Portuguese “empire”, Spanish “empire”, British “empire”, French Indo-China, Malaya Federation, Anglo-Egyptian-Sudan, Central African Federation, United Arab Republic, Mali Federation, Senegambia Confederation, West & East Pakistan, Soviet Union, Yugoslavia,
Czechoslovakia, Ethiopia,
the Sudan...
What has indeed been the grounding feature of the state in world history on this
accord, thankfully, has rather been “divisibility”, “dissolubility”, “destructibility”,
each the antonym of that 3-headed genocidist mantra mouthed off at random by
quite a few spokespersons of especially the genocide-state in Africa.
It is therefore not surprising that twenty-three
(23) new states have, for example, emerged in Europe since
the end of the 1980s. Even though a population of about 350 million, one-third
of Africa’s, Europeans presently have more states per capita than peoples of Africa! And
as history shows, the catastrophe is not the collapse of the
state; the catastrophe is the attempt to destroy constituent peoples within the state as the Anglo-Nigeria amalgam has sought in Biafra since 29 May 1966. Here
lies the Igbo Question.
First African American-owned and edited newspaper is founded by Rev Peter Williamsand a group of influential African Americans in New York, and aptly named Freedom’s Journal
(Jackie McLean Quartet, “Melody for Melonae” [personnel: McLean, alto saxophone; Walter Davis, Jr., piano; Herbie Lewis, bass; Billy Higgins, drums; recorded: Van Gelder Studios, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US, 19 March 1962])
FWD: “Soldiers banned
newspaper vendors in Aba bearing Biafra reports”, Aba City Blog, Tuesday 15 March 2016
“Newspaper vendors in Aba, are now living
fear, as soldiers from 144 Battalion, which is under Ohafia 14 Brigade, stormed
St. Michael’s Road at about 7am, in two Hilux vans and seized their papers
bearing Biafra reports.
“One of
the vendors who spoke to The Nation,
said, ‘At about some minutes past seven, soldiers in two Hilux vans arrived
with one of the vendors that they picked along the Mosque, asking him to point
at the person who gave him the paper. But the vendor could not, because the
person who gave him the paper had gone … They asked to know the publishers or
suppliers but got no response. Then they confiscated New Republic, Vesym, Freedom Journal and some copies of The Authority which carried Biafra
stories. We are yet to be told the reason for the confiscation, but the truth
is that we have lost money as many readers were disappointed.’
“A
publisher, who pleaded for anonymity, condemned the action of the soldiers. He
said they were overstepping their bounds and vowed that ‘attempts by the
military to gag the press will fail. We are publishing reports about Biafra
like other national dailies do. Let them close down all the media houses
because they are carrying Biafra stories, after all, we are not the only ones
publishing stories on Biafra.’”
Poet, literary critic, academic, university president (vice-chancellor), offers selfless and distinguished service as head of the crucial Biafran resistance government communication directorate during the Igbo genocide, 29 May 1966-12 January 1970, carried out by Nigeria and Britain with the total of 3.1 million Igbo people or one-quarter of this nation’s population murdered
(Nicola Sturgeon:“Our dream is for
Scotland to become independent … To be in the driving seat of our own destiny”)
Nicola Sturgeon, leader of the Scottish Nationalist Party and
first minister of Scotland has announced that Scotland will try again to vote
in a new referendum for the restoration of independence, 309 years after union
with England in the state called United Kingdom. In the last referendum exercise
in October 2014, the “Yes-for-independence” vote scored 45 per cent against the
“No” campaigners who won by receiving 55 per cent. Speaking yesterday (Saturday
12 March 2016) at the SNP’s spring conference in Glasgow, Sturgeon quoted Eleanor
Roosevelt, wife of a former US president, who memorably stressed that the “future
belongs to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams”. For Sturgeon,
Our dream is for Scotland to become independent … To be in the
driving seat of our own destiny, to shape our own future. And on the basis of
equality with our family across the British Isles and our friends across the
globe, to play our part in building a better world. That is a beautiful dream.
And we believe in it.
No peoples are exempt Roosevelt’s vision and Sturgeon’s studied inspiration from it is
indeed shared not only by Scots but by a stretch of peoples and nations across
the globe. The Igbo people of Biafra in southwestcentral Africa, 3475 miles
southeast of Scotland, are proud to belong to this illustrious heritage. For 50
years, beginning on 29 May 1966, the Igbo have sought to be in the “driving
seat of their destiny … and shape [their] own future” but have been subjected to
a devastating genocide by Nigeria and
Britain, the very country that Scotland has been part of since 1707. In fact,
quite a few prominent Scottish politicians, most of whom were in the (British) Labour
party at the time, were active agents in the perpetration of this genocide. In phases I-III of the genocide (29 May
1966-12 January 1970), the Anglo-Nigerian genocidist amalgam murdered 3.1 million
Igbo people or one-quarter of this nation’s population.
This genocide is still continuing. Since Muhammadu Buhari (current
head of regime in Nigeria who the British played a key role to install and wholeheartedly
supports) came to power in May 2015, hundreds of Igbo people demanding the
restoration of their independence have been murdered – usually shot at sight
during peaceful freedom marches by the Nigerian military equipped mostly with
British weapons.
Unlike the Igbo, Scotland is not seeking freedom from the United
Kingdom because it has been assailed by genocide or any other crimes from the
union. Of course not. On the contrary, Scotland has been a distinct beneficiary
from the union including access to the gargantuan wealth seized by the union across
the globe during its centuries of conquests and occupations which included Biafra
and other regions of the African World (http://re-thinkingafrica.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/rights-for-scots-rights-for-igbo.html). What Scotland seeks from the UK is
freedom to be in the “driving seat of their destiny”, the right of
self-determination which is inalienable, which is for all peoples, which is
recognised by the United Nations. No peoples are therefore exempt from this
right whatever may be their status, experience or circumstance in the state
from which they wish to exit.
Appropriately it couldn’t Britain, a signatory to the relevant articles of the UN
convention that recognises this right to self-determination prefers,
understandably, that Scotland continues its constituent relationship with the UK-union but respects Scotland’s right to seek to be “in the driving seat of [its] own destiny”.
Appropriately, the British military or police couldn’t, conceivably, disrupt yesterday’s
SNP conference in Glasgow nor stop Nicola Sturgeon from making her speech for
renewed referendum for the restoration of independence. As in the
2014 Scottish voting process (http://re-thinkingafrica.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/rights-for-scots-rights-for-igbo.html),
no Scottish voter, for or against restoration-of-independence at the Forth
Bridge, outside Edinburgh, or in Glasgow or Inverness or Aye or Aberdeen
or Stranraer or Edinburgh or Arbroath or Wick or indeed anywhere in Scotland would
ever be shot at or harmed in any way by the British
police/military/MI5/whatever in exercising this inalienable right, guaranteed
by the United Nations, to decide on this crucial testament of freedom.
Britain’s Nigeria Astonishingly,
in sharp contrast, Britain’s Nigeria, also a signatory to the UN declaration on
the rights of peoples to self-determination, would have sent its genocidist
military to drown a Glasgow-style Biafran freedom party conference held in any
of the Biafran cities of Enuugwu, Onicha, Oka, Igwe Ocha, Aba or Asaba, for
instance, in an orgy of massacres of the attending delegates and leaders. Nnamdi
Kanu and several leaders and officials of the Biafran freedom movement are
currently incarcerated in illegal detentions by the Nigeria regime. Given the
antecedent of Britain’s stony silence on not only these arrests but also on the string of recent massacres of Biafrans, beginning November 2015, Britain would very unlikely
condemn any such expanded murder outrage by its Nigeria client-state and leadership.
The link
below shows the crux of Nicola Sturgeon’s yesterday’s important address to the
Scottish people on plans for a new referendum to decide Scotland's future. Many observers, including those sympathetic to the course of the Nigeria genocidist regime, have shown repeatedly that if a referendum were held in Biafra today to determine the wishes of the people, the overwhelming majority of the population would vote for “restoration-of-independence” (http://re-thinkingafrica.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/how-anti-biafran-freedom-columnist.html). Inevitably, Britain will surely explain to the wider world
much sooner than later why it accepts the rights of 5 million Scots to exercise
this freedom which could cause the collapse of a union of 309 years but is
unrelentingly instrumental in waging/supporting a 50-year-old genocide campaign
against 50 million Igbo people who equally want their own freedom. Statute of limitations It is
absolutely crucial to remind all those involved in the prosecution of the Igbo
genocide, wherever they are domiciled, that there is no statute of limitations in international law in the
apprehension, prosecution and punishment of persons or institutions involved in
the crime of genocide. Igbo seek and will achieve justice for the perpetration
of this crime against its people, a crime against humanity. It doesn’t matter
how long it takes. Igbo seek and will achieve the restoration of Biafra.
(Nicola Sturgeon:“... This summer we will embark on a new initiative to build support for Scottish independence...”)
Award-winning trumpeter, bandleader, educator and versatile composer whose output includes a range of film scores especially the critically-acclaimed music for director Spike Lee’s 2006 documentary, When the Leeves Broke:A Requiem in Four Acts on the tragedy of Hurricane Katrina
Terence Blanchard Sextet & Orchestra, “Levees” [personnel: Blanchard, trumpet; Brice Winston, tenor and soprano saxophones; Aaron Parks, piano; Derrick Hodge, acoustic and electric basses; Kendrick Scott, drums, percussion; Zack Harmon, tabla drums; Northwest Sinofia {40-member string orchestra, conducted by Blanchard}; recorded: Blue Note, New York, 14 August 2007])
Visiting head-of-regime
of Imo administrative region:Who are you? … Do you know who I am?
Dignified flag-carrying exponent of the Biafra freedom movement:I am a Biafran … Why are
you here [in London]? What are you talking about while our people are being murdered [sic] ... in the region you administer? … You must tell the world what is happening …
Tell the truth …
(Chatham House exchange, London, Wednesday 9 March 2016)
Herbert Ekwe-Ekwe is specialist on the state and on genocide & wars in Africa in the post-1966 epoch – beginning with the Igbo genocide, 29 May 1966-present day, the foundational and most gruesome genocide of post-(European)conquest Africa. 3.1 million Igbo or 25 per cent of this nation’s population were murdered by Nigeria and its allies, principally Britain. Africa and the rest of the world largely stood by and watched as the perpetrators enacted this horror most ruthlessly. The world could have stopped this genocide; the world should have stopped this genocide. This genocide inaugurated Africa’s current age of pestilence. During the period, 12 million additional Africans have been murdered in further genocide in Rwanda (1994), Zaïre/DRCongo (variously, since the late 1990s) and Darfur – west of the Sudan – (since 2004) and in other wars in Africa. African peoples have, presently, no other choice but exit/dismantle the extant genocide-state (the bane of their existence & progress) & construct own nation-centred states that serve their interests. He is author of several books & papers on the subject and his new book is entitled The longest genocide – since 29 May 1966 (2019).